Post by nurnobi85 on Feb 12, 2024 6:22:29 GMT
Which are advised by law firms specialized in filing lawsuits in the judicial system, forcing the Brazilian State to acquire Inrterferon Peguilado from companies like Roche that produce the medicine in Brazil. It should be noted that although Roche claims that Pegylated Interferon has a 6% higher response than conventional Interferon, there is no scientific consensus on the subject. The judges receive these actions and, incorrectly, determine the purchase of this medicine, leading public health budgets in Brazil to bankruptcy. In practice, the Brazilian State is the sole and exclusive buyer of Pegylated Interferon in Brazil, together with Roche and Schering-Plough (both based in Switzerland), due to the high cost involved.
In the State of São Paulo, for example, the richest in Brazil, if Roche's Pegylated Interferon were widely supplied, it would consume more than half of the entire public health budget. The question is: what about the other patients, how would they be? It is noted that the formulation of public policies is a Dubai Email List very delicate matter. For this reason, it is not the judges, not elected by the population, who must decide what will be the priority area that a State poor in resources — such as the Brazilian State — should invest in the health area. This choice depends on a model that combines principles of participatory democracy — through NGOs, for example — with principles of representative democracy.
that is, through a communication channel between members of Congress and the people who elected them. And in this scenario, judges have no role? Yes, Brazilian judges have an important role to play, namely, ensuring that public policies already approved by Congress are faithfully executed, guaranteeing access for all Brazilian citizens, rich or poor, to the public health system, under equal conditions. If a public policy has been formulated by the elected government or is provided for by law, judges must ensure that the "promises of the law" are fulfilled. However, they should not create public policies that are not supported by the law and the Constitution, because they do not have democratic legitimacy.The gross profit margin of two gas stations in Porto Alegre cannot exceed.
In the State of São Paulo, for example, the richest in Brazil, if Roche's Pegylated Interferon were widely supplied, it would consume more than half of the entire public health budget. The question is: what about the other patients, how would they be? It is noted that the formulation of public policies is a Dubai Email List very delicate matter. For this reason, it is not the judges, not elected by the population, who must decide what will be the priority area that a State poor in resources — such as the Brazilian State — should invest in the health area. This choice depends on a model that combines principles of participatory democracy — through NGOs, for example — with principles of representative democracy.
that is, through a communication channel between members of Congress and the people who elected them. And in this scenario, judges have no role? Yes, Brazilian judges have an important role to play, namely, ensuring that public policies already approved by Congress are faithfully executed, guaranteeing access for all Brazilian citizens, rich or poor, to the public health system, under equal conditions. If a public policy has been formulated by the elected government or is provided for by law, judges must ensure that the "promises of the law" are fulfilled. However, they should not create public policies that are not supported by the law and the Constitution, because they do not have democratic legitimacy.The gross profit margin of two gas stations in Porto Alegre cannot exceed.